(1.) CRIMINAL Revision No. 2360 of 2010 is directed against the orders dated 22.4.2010 and 7.6.2010 and CRIMINAL Revision No. 3884 of 2010 is directed against the order dated 6.9.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 8, Bareilly in Sessions Trial No. 244 of 2009, State v. Pramod Kumar and others, arising out of case crime No. 311 of 2008 under Sections 498- A, 304-B IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Qyolaria, District Bareilly. Since both the revisions arise out of the same case, they are being disposed of by a common order.
(2.) SRI R.K. Singh, advocate file memos of appearance on behalf of opposite party No. 2 in both the revisions. The same be kept on record. Heard SRI Amit SRIvastava, learned counsel for the revisionists, learned A.G A. for the State, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 and perused the material available on record.
(3.) LEARNED A.G.A. and learned counsel for the complainant supported the impugned orders and submitted that autopsy report by itself is sufficient to frame charge under Section 302 IPC in the alternative.