PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUPPLEMENTARY affidavit filed on behalf of the revisionist is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned AGA and perused the record.

(2.) THIS is a revision against the charges dated 19.7:2010 framed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-Ill, Court No. 3, Bareilly against the revisionist under Sections 324/34, 504 and 506 IPC.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the revisionist further submitted that it was obligatory on the part of the learned Magistrate to make compliance of Section 207 of the Code before framing the charges. Copies of the statements of the witnesses and documents, being relied in support of the charges, have not been furnished to the revisionist, therefore, framing of the charges was not proper.