SUNIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) We have heard Sri Dharmendra Kumar Pandey, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, and perused the record.

(2.) The present Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner making the following prayers:

(3.) Another order was passed on 25.4.2005 in the Writ Petition permitting the Petitioner to implead the persons posted at Allahabad as Respondents No. 6 to 11 in the Writ Petition, and notices were directed to be issued to the said private Respondents. However, no steps were taken by the Petitioner for issuance of notices as per the order dated 25.4.2005 passed by the Court on the Writ Petition as is evident from the office reports dated 4.6.2005 and 16.9.2005.