RAM NATH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) V. K. Chaturvedi, J. This revision has been preferred against the order dated 20-10-2000 passed by the Civil Judge (SD), Hamirpur in criminal case No. 169/11/99, Ranno Devi v. Satya Narain (son of the revisionist), in a proceedings under Sec tion 125 Crpc, whereby joint property of the revisionist was recorded to be at tached.

(2.) IT has been argued by Mr. S. Dwivedi learned Counsel for the revisionist that property of the revisionist has wrongly been adduced to be attached because son of the revisionist has no con cern with the property and without giving any notice or summon the impugned order has been passed.

(3.) THE revision is accordingly dis missed.