NAMEY ALI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) KRISHNA Kumar, J. This revision has been filed against the order dated 7-12-1999 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad in Criminal Case No. 5131/9/1999 whereby the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad issued non-bail able warrant of arrest against the revisionists after taking cognizance.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the revisionists contended that the revisionists were oppos ing the charge-sheet. When the case was investigated by the police and charge-sheet was submitted and the Court had taken cog nizance, the accused could file objections at the stage when the learned Magistrate or Sessions Judge proposes to frame the charges against the accused persons. The revisionists could at that stage have a right to argue that no prima facie, case is made out against them. The accused at this stage have no right to get the proceedings stayed.

(3.) IN view of the above, I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the learned Magistrate. The revision has no force, it is accordingly dismissed. Revision dismissed. .