SHANKAR PRASAD Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner is ag grieved by the recovery proceeding initial ly started against the petitioner on some wrong advice as the petitioner never ob tained any power connection and still a bill was forwarded showing the arrears of electricity charges. Sri Dhirendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that if the initial demand was without any basis, no question of paying any recovery charges arises.

(2.) SRI Sudhir Agarwal has been heard for the Electricity Board and its officials, while SRI S. C. Rai, Additional Chief Stand ing Counsel has appeared for the State of U. P. and the Tehsildar Chail (Sadar) Al lahabad.