REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ABDUL RASHEED Appellant

V/S

ANWAR AHMAD Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

DY. COMMISSIONER,HARDOI V. RAMA KRISHNA NARAYAN AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
PARASNATH RAI V. TILESHRE KUER [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN SINGH V. BALBIR SINGH [REFERRED TO]
PANKAJ BHARGAVA V. MOHINDER NATH [REFERRED TO]
LALLAN PRASAD V. RADHA KISHUN PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
LAXMI NARAIN V. SMT. HUBRAJA [REFERRED TO]
SATISH CHANDRA GHOSH V. KALIDASI DASI [REFERRED TO]
HAIDER HUSSAIN V. FATIMA [REFERRED TO]
RAM KALAP PANDE V. BANSHIDHAR [REFERRED TO]
RAM SUKH V. RAM PHER [REFERRED TO]
NARAYAN BHAGWANTRAO GOSAVI BALAJIWALE VS. GOPAL VINAYAK GOSAVI [REFERRED TO]
CHUNILGJ V MEHTA SONS LIMITED ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA INTERVENER VS. CENTURY SPINNING MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
KHARBUJA KUER VS. JANGBAHADUR RAI [REFERRED TO]
KALWA DEVADATTAM KALWA DEVADATTAM VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
NARAYAN GOVIND GAVATE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA:NARAYAN GOVIND GAVATE [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. MOKSH BUILDERS AND FINANCIERS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
BALA SHANKAR MAHA SHANKER BHATTJEE VS. CHARITY COMMISSIONER GUJARAT STATE [REFERRED TO]
MAHANT HAR KISHAN DAS VS. SATGUR PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
DEBI PRASAD VS. CHHOTEY LAL [REFERRED TO]
DAYA SHANKAR VS. BACHI [REFERRED TO]
YASHPAL SINGH MALIK VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL DAS VS. THAKURJI [REFERRED TO]
MUSST FARID-UN-NISA VS. MUNSHI MUKHTAR AHMED [REFERRED TO]
MAMOLA VS. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Property is one of the causes of family feauds--greed is another. Dispute among the family members in this case is perhaps because of both. This is how it has come about. The facts

(2.) Abdul Samad is the common ancestor. He had four sons : three of them are Abdul Rasheed. Abdul Hameed and Abdul Sattar (the appellants) and Abdul Majeed is fourth one. Abdul Majeed has five sons (the contesting respondents). Abdul Samad and his son Abdul Majeed were co-tenure holders in plot No. 79 (area 5 biswa) of village Tanda. They together executed a sale deed dated 3.7.1969 (Ex. 16) of this property for Rs. 1.500 in favour of one Abdul Majid--a stranger to the family. (Abdul Majid is different person than Abdul Majeed may not be confused with him.) Abdul Samad was apart from other properties, exclusive owner of plot No. 168 (area 9 bigha 9 biswa) of village Muradpur. He also executed a second sale deed (Ex. 1) on the same day, i.e., 3.7.1969 of this property for Rs. 10,000 in favour of the contesting respondents--his grandsons from his son Abdul Majeed.

(3.) Abdul Samad filed the present suit on 28.8.1969 against the contesting respondents for cancellation of the sale deed in their favour. The Plaint allegations are that:

Click here to view full judgment.

ABDUL RASHEED Vs. ANWAR AHMAD

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address