KAILASH NARAIN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision has been filed against order dated 19 -3 -1999 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Moradabad in Criminal Revision No. 306 of 1998 whereby setting aside the order of the learned trial Court.

(2.) HEARD learned Counsel for the par ­ties.

(3.) IT is contended that the admitted hand -writing is the best piece of evidence for comparision by the Expert and in case, the said documents were not sufficient for comparision, other papers could also have been sent for comparision because the accused was principal of the Institution and there could be hundred of documents written in the hand writing of accused and there was no reason for sample hand -writ ­ing. It is also contended that once the order was passed by the Court on 8 -10 -1996 for sending the admitted documents for com ­parision, the sample hand -writing could not be sent.