RAM LAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. K. Rathi, J. This revision is directed against the order dated 22-1-2000 passed in Session trial No. 95 of 1999 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Lalitpur by which he framed charges for offences under Sections 307/149 and 323/149,1. RC. in respect of each of the injured Sunder Lal, Rakesh Kumar and Smt. Shyam Bai and also for offence under Section 147, I. P. C.

(2.) I have heard Sri S. P. Sharma, learned Counsel for the applicants and the A. G. A. opposite party No. 4 has not ap peared in spite of service of notice and therefore, he could not be heard.

(3.) SOME of the injuries were caused on vital parts. It is no doubt true that no bone injury was found and all the injuries were simple. For this reason at this stage, it cannot be said that there was no intention to commit murder and the offences under Sections 323 and 324,1. P. C. only is made out. This question can be decided after the evidence in this case.