PRADEEP SINGH Vs. JASPAL SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision has been filed against the order of the learned Additional Commissioner dated 7-4-2000 by which name of the respondents Nos. 5 to 9 have been deleted. Being aggrieved by this order of the learned Additional Commissioner dated 7-4-2000 this revision has been filed by Pradeep Singh son of Chain Singh.

(2.) HEARD the learned Counsel for both the parties.

(3.) IT has been argued by the learned Counsel for the opposite- parties that ap­peal was not maintainable before the Commissioner because no appeal lies against a compromise decree. A suit under Section 229-B of the UPZA and LR Act was filed by Ram Lubhaya etc. against Prithiviraj and others son of Jagpal Singh and Gurnam Singh has filed an implead­ment application dated 25-10-99 before the SDO Pooranpur vide his order dated 19-11-99 has decreed the suit of the plain­tiff and impleadment application dated 25-10-99 was dismissed. Being aggrieved by this order Jaspal Singh and Gurnam Singh have filed appeal before the Com­missioner in which opposite-parties Nos. 5 to 9 Pradeep Singh, Jasvinder Singh, Gur-daspal Singh, Gurdip Singh and Surjit Singh respondents 5 to 9 were also made parties. Satish Singh has submitted an ap­plication before the Additional Commis­sioner in which he has prayed that respondents 5 to 9 were not parties before the trial Court and on this basis appeal be dismissed. On this application Additional Commissioner has ordered on 4-7-99 that the name of the respondents 5 to 9 will be deleted.