SAFDAR ALI Vs. GAJENDRA KUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision has been filed against the order of the learned Additional Commissioner dated 11-8-2000 in which learned Additional Com­missioner has set aside the order dated 21-9-99passedinAppealNo. 131/6/98.

(2.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the revisionist. It has been argued by the learned Counsel for the revisionist that the appeal was fixed for hearing. The learned Counsel for the opposite-party appeared in the Court and he has informed the Court that he has no instruction for the arguments from his client. The appeal was heard ex parte and appeal was decided on 21-9-99. A restora­tion application was moved by the opposite-party on 15-11- 99 for setting aside the order dated 21-9-99 passed in the appeal.

(3.) REVISION is not fit for admission and is dismissed. Revision dismissed.