RAJ KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This writ petition is directed against the orders dated 25.3.1992, contained in Annexures-1 and 2, compulsorily retiring the petitioner from the post of Lekhpal.

(2.) The facts of the case, in brief, are that a Screening Committee consisting of Registrar Kanungo, Naib Tehsildar, Tehsildar and Sub-Divisional Officer, Biswan, district Sitapur met on 1.2.1992 and after considering the case of the petitioner, recommended for his compulsory retirement on the following grounds :

(3.) Agreeing with the recommendation of the Screening Committee, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Biswan, district Sitapur passed the impugned order dated 25.3.1992, contained in Annexure-2 to the writ petition compulsorily retiring the petitioner with immediate effect making further allegations in the aforesaid order that the petitioner does not take interest in the works of his post but his work is only to do politics.