(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. This writ peti tion is directed against the order dated 5-8-1999, whereby Respondent No. 1 al lowed the appeal and released the disputed accommodation in favour of the landlord-respondent.
(2.) RESPONDENT No. 2 is landlord of the shop in question of which the petitioner is tenant. He filed application under Section 21 (l) (a) of UP. Act No. 13 of 1972 (in short the Act), with the allegations that his son Anil Kumar is unemployed and wants to start a Chemist shop. He passed B. Sc. examination in IIIrd division and could not get admission in M- Sc. The petitioner contested the application and denied the averments made by the landlord. The Prescribed Authority rejected the applica tion by its order dated 4-5-1988. Respon dent No. 2 filed appeal against the said order. The Appellate Authority allowed the appeal on 5-8-1989, reversing the find ing recorded by the Prescribed Authority and released the disputed accommodation in his favour. This order has been chal lenged in the present writ petition.