KUNWAR PAL SHARMA Vs. SPECIAL JUDGE MATHURA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. H. Zaidi, J. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India petitioner challen ges the validity of the order dated 7-7-2000 By which the application for amendment of the memo or revision has been rejected by the revisional Court.

(2.) IT appears that it is on 30-3-1991 that the suit was decreed by the Judge Small Causes Court. Challenging the validity of the said decree the petitioner filed a revision before the Court below. After about nine years, petitioner filed an application for amendment in the memo or revision. By means of the said applica tion petitioner wanted to add following ground in the memo of revision:

(3.) I have considered the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and also gone through the material on record. By means of the amendment application petitioner simply wanted permission to raise a question of law. That question could be raised without amending the memo of revision with the permission of the Court as the question which is sought to be raised was a pure question of law and did not involve factual controversy. In view of these facts, I do not find any justification for the Court below to reject the application of the petitioner and keep the revision pending.