PURSHOTTAM SINGH Vs. COLLECTOR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner asserts that he worked as a Peon on daily wage basis in the office of Mining Officer, Collectorate, Hamirpur from August 1, 1990 to December 5, 1995 without break and he has been illegally disengaged from employment without any reasonable and sufficient cause and has been thrown out of job.

(2.) It is prayed by the petitioner, that a writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue on the post of Peon in the office of Mining Officer, in Collectorate, Hamirpur and pay him salary admissible to the post. He has also prayed for a direction to the respondent to regularise him on the post of Peon.

(3.) Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. A Division Bench of this Court in Vimal Chand Pandey v. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, 2000 (1) UPLBEC 240 held that