SARTAJ Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. K. Rathi, J. On an application of the opposite party No. 2, under Section 125, Cr PC , she has been allowed main tenance @ Rs. 400/- per month from the date of the application, i. e. , 8-6-1998 by order dated 24- 1-2000 passed by Judge, Family Court, Meerut. Against that order the present revision has been filed.

(2.) I have heard Sri N. I. Jafri, learned Counsel for the revisionist, Sri D. K. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the op posite party No. 2 and the learned A. G. A.

(3.) CONSIDERING the circumstances and the facts that no such plea was taken in the memo of revision, that the maintenance should be ordered to be awarded from the date of the order. The argument of the learned Counsel for the revisionist can not be accepted.