NAYEEM Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. K. Rathi, J. Heard Sri Saghir Ahmad, learned Counsel for the revisionist and the A. G. A.

(2.) THE applicant/revisionist is an ac cused in S. T. No. 527 of 1995, State v. Nayeem, under Sections 394 and 302, I. P. C. , pending in the Court of III Addi tional Sessions Judge, Saharanpur. THE applicant moved an application No. 129-Kha to call the witnesses in defence. That application was rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge by an order dated 13-4-2000. Aggrieved by it, the present revision has been preferred.

(3.) IT may also be mentioned that the copy of the application 129-Kha has also been filed by the applicant. The perusal of the application shows that no reason has been mentioned as to why the witnesses are required to be examiend in defence and how their statements are necessary. There fore, it appears that the sole purpose is to delay the disposal of the session trial.