SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision under Section 397/401, Cr. P.C. against the order dated 12.10.1998 passed by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Revision No. 60 of 1997.

(2.) I have heard Sri S. M. Dayal, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri R. B. Sahai, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2.

(3.) THERE is no provision for making local inspection in Section 145, Cr. P.C. The possession cannot be ascertained by way of local inspection. THEREfore, the order of the learned Magistrate directing the Tehsildar to make local inspection to ascertain possession was wholly illegal. That order was rightly set aside.