KAMLAWATI Vs. KOTWAL RASRA BALLIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. K. Yog. J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondents.

(2.) PETITIONER claiming to be the Pradhan of the village filed a suit and certain interim order was obtained. Thereafter an application was filed before the Civil Court complaining breach of the interim order. These orders are ex parte.

(3.) I regret that this petition has been filed casually. Petitioner has not even cared to produce Government Order/s dealing with the subject. The reliefs sought, if allowed, are bound to seriously prejudice respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6. Petitioner ought to have taken utmost care to place before this Court relevant Government Orders and legislative enact ments, e. g. , Trees and Plant Protection Act, Necessary Licensing Act and Forest Corporation Act, Park and Playground Act, etc. This Court takes judicial notice that right to life includes right to health, which necessarily means maintenance of ecology and to check pollution.