(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. This writ peti tion is directed against the order dated 1-7-1999 passed by the Prescribed Authority rejecting the application filed by the petitioners for amendment of their written statement.
(2.) BRIEFLY stated the facts are that respondent No. 2 filed an application under Section 21 (l) (a) of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972 alleging that the petitioners were tenant of the shop in question. He requires it bona fide for his personal need. The petitioners filed written statement. They admitted that they were tenants of the disputed premises.
(3.) IN view of the above the writ peti tion is allowed subject to the observation made above and the order of the Prescribed Authority dated 1-7-1999 is hereby quashed. The parties shall bear their own costs. .