RAM DEEN Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision petition preferred against the judgment and order dated 14-10-1988 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Jhansi Division, Jhansi, arising out of an order dated 15-7-1986 passed by the learned trial Court in the proceedings under Section 198 (4) of the UPZA and LR Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').

(2.) THESE proceedings were initiated under Section 198 (4) of the Act upon a complaint moved on behalf of one Ramdin for cancellation of the lease, granted in favour of the revisionist. The learned trial Court after completing the requisite formalities found the aforesaid lease irregular and has cancelled the same on 15-7-1986. Aggrieved by this order, a revision petition was preferred. The learned Additional Commissioner has upheld the aforesaid order passed by the learned trial Court and dismissed the revision on 14-10-1988. Hence this second revision petition.

(3.) I have carefully and closely examined the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties and also the relevant records on file. On an examination of the record, it is crystal clear that the learned Additional Collector, Lalitpur has cancelled the aforesaid lease on 15-7-1986. As per the dictum of law enunciated by the Hon'ble High Court in a decision reported in 1996 RD 190, I find much substance in the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the revisionist.