STATE OF U P Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE JHANSI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) KHEM Karan, J. All the three writ petitions, mentioned above, are connected with each other, hence they are being dis posed of by this common order.

(2.) HEARD Sri Haider Hussain, the learned standing Counsel for the State and S/sri B. N. Agrawal and J. P. Likhdhari, learned counsel for the landlord.

(3.) THE Prescribed Authority disposed of the matter vide its order dated 12-1-98. He accepted the valuation report sub mitted by the Tahsildar and accordingly valued the building and the land measur ing 2058 sq. feet at Rs. 7,69,000. According to him, the rent on such valuation was to be fixed at Rs. 6,400 a month, but he reduced this amount to Rs. 4,000 taking into con sideration the miserable condition of the building and the fact that the increase in the rent was to put a burden on the State Exchequer.