ANIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri R. N. Sharma, learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned A.G.A.

(2.) THE revisionist was convicted in Case No. 1196 of 1992, for offence under Sections 304A, 279 and 338, I.P.C. and was sentenced to undergo five months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 200 for offence under Section 279, I.P.C. and for offence under Section 304A, I.P.C. he was sentenced for two years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 400 by the judgment and order, dated 11.1.1999, passed by the VIIth A.C.J.M., Meerut. Against the conviction the applicant preferred Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1999, which has been decided on 9.3.2000. THE conviction for both the offences have been maintained. However, the sentences were reduced and he was sentenced for rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 200 for offence under Section 279, I.P.C. and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 400 for offence under Section 304A, I.P.C. Aggrieved by it, the present revision has been preferred.