VIRENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. K. RATHI, J. The order, dated 15-12-1994 passed by VHIth Additional Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr in Sessions trial No. 337 of 1989 under Section 498-A/304-B IPC rejecting the application of the applicant, who is the complainant in the case under Section 319 Cr. P. C. , to summon the opposite party No. 2 to stand trial with other accused for offences under Section 498-A, 304- B. , I. P. C. has been challenged in this revision.

(2.) I have heard Sri Apul Misra, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri D. R. Choudhary learned counsel for op posite party No. 2.

(3.) ACCORDINGLY the revisiorris allowed and the impugned order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr dated 15-12- 1994 is quashed. He is directed to summon the opposite party No-2 to stand trial with other accused for offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC. and after appearance of the opposite party No. 2 he shall proceed with the case in accordance with law. Revision allowed .