JAGAT RAM Vs. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALOKE Chakrabarti, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respon dents.

(2.) THE contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner's husband was working in the post of Beldar under the respon dents. He rendered service for more than eleven years continuously. While on duty he met with an accident and expired on 2-3-1995. THE petitioner's application for compassionate appointment in view of the service rendered by the petitioner did not produce any result and although all the formalities were completed and petitioner is facing extreme hardship but neither any decision has yet been communicated by the respondents nor the petitioner has been provided suitable job.

(3.) IN view of aforesaid, I am of the opinion that as petitioner's husband worked in the department for more than ten years till his death, the petitioner is entitled to benefit of compassionate ap pointment though the petitioner's hus band was working on daily wage basis.