MAM RAJ Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE ALMORA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. This writ peti tion is directed against the order dated 31-7-1998 passed by Respondent No. 1 rejecting the application of the petitioners to take two affidavits on the record in appeal.

(2.) THE petitioners filed an applica tion under Section 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972 for release of the disputed accommodation in possession of Respon dent No. 2 on the ground of bonafide need. THE prescribed authority rejected the ap plication. THE petitioners preferred an ap peal against the said order before the Dis trict Judge.

(3.) IN view of the order passed by this Court and fresh affidavits filed by the petitioners, this writ petition has become in-fructuous. The affidavits, if filed by the petitioners, shall be considered in accordance with law as directed by this Court in 23-9-1998.