NAKUL KUMAR Vs. CHAMPA DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. This writ peti tion is directed against the order dated 24-8-1999 passed by the prescribed authority whereby he allowed the release application and the order of the appellate authority dated 11-1-2000 dismissing the appeal against the said order.

(2.) THE landlady-respondent filed ap plication for release of the disputed shop against the petitioner with the allegations that she requires the disputed shop for her son Surendra Kumar Jaiswal to establish him in business. THE petitioner contested the application. THE prescribed authority recorded a finding that the son of the' landlady Surendra Kumar Jaiswal requires the disputed shop for carrying on business. This finding has been affirmed by the ap pellate authority. I do not find any legal infirmity in the finding.