MOHAN LAL Vs. DORI LAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Pandey, J. This is a revision under Section 333 of 'upza and LR Act. preferred against the judgment and order dated August 28, 1992, passed by the learned Addl. Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad arising out of an order dated 22-7-91 passed by the learned trial Court on the application for amendment moved by the revisionist.

(2.) BRIEF and relevant facts of the case are that during the proceedings of the case before the learned trial Court. An applica tion dated 12-10-89 for amendment in the written statement was moved. The learned trial Court by means of its order dated July 22, 1991 rejected the aforesaid applica tion. Aggrieved by this order a revision was preferred. The learned Addl. Com missioner dismissed the revision on August 28, 1992. Hence, this second revision.

(3.) HAVING scrutinized the matter in question, 1 find that by means of the proposed amendment the nature of the suit shall not be changed as such 1 see no reason to reject the aforesaid application for amendment. In order to promote the ends of the substantive natural justice and to facilitate to its course, it would be quite just and proper to allow the aforesaid ap plication for amendment to advance the natural justice between the parties.