JANENDRA KUMAR JINDAL Vs. IST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. This writ peti tion is directed against the order of prescribed authority dated 8-12-1994 al lowing the release application and the order of the appellate authority dismissing the appeal against the aforesaid order.

(2.) THE landlord-respondent filed ap plication for release of the disputed shop with the allegation that he is unemployed and wants to carry on business in the dis puted shop. It is alleged that Ratan Lal is his grand-father and adopted him and he succeeded Ratan Lal. It was further stated that Ratan Lal executed a Will on 13-8-1994 and under this Will the shop in dis pute was bequeathed in his favour.

(3.) I have heard Sri Ravi Kant, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Tandon, learned Counsel for the respon dents.