RAM PAL YADAV Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) O. P. Garg, J. Heard Sri N. A. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned standing counsel.

(2.) THE petitioner who was Junior As sistant, stood superannuated on 31-1-1997. Pensionary and retrial benefits have not been released in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that since the petitioner was a retrenched employee, his case is to be governed by the Government order dated 11-11-1993, a copy of which is Annexure-2 to this petition. It is stated that after proper computation of the length of service of the petitioner in1 the light of the aforesaid Government Order, the petitioner shall be entitled to pension ary and retrial benefits, which have not been released. THE factual aspect of the matter can not be gone into and decided by this Court in writ jurisdiction under Ar ticle 226 of Constitution of India. I, there fore, leave the matter for being decided by the departmental authorities.