(1.) THIS second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 9-4-96 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Faizabad Division, Faizabad, arising out of a suit under Section 229-B of UPZA and LR Act decided by the trial Court vide the order dated 16-2-1987wherebythesuit has been decreed.
(2.) I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have gone through the relevant papers on file.
(3.) AFTER hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and perusing the records, the relevant facts of the case are that on institution of a suit under Section 229-B of UPZA and LR Act by the plaintiff/appellant in respect of the disputed plot No. 87M situate at village Sheonathpur Pargana Khandasa, Tehsil Bikapur, District Faizabad. Notices were issued to the defendant-respondents. The suit was contested by way of filing the writteen statement stating therein that the land in dispute was acquired for the purposes of Narendradeo Krishi University and the tenure-holder were given compensations in accordance with law by the land acquisition officer. After completing the formalities in accordance with the provisions laid down for the same and since the acquisition and delivery of possession in favour of University was made and it was being used by the University the land was not identifiable on the spot. On the basis of pleadings of the parties as many as 10 issues were framed in the matter; in order to adjudication of the case parties were allowed to adduce evidence in support of their claims and they did so. After the close of evidence the impugned order was passed by the learned trial Court whereby the suit preferred by the plaintiff-appellant stood decreed. Against which a time barred appeal and a revision were preferred before the Commissioner, Faizabad Division which were heard by the learned Additional Commissioner after consolidating the revision and appeal as mentioned above. Aggrieved by this order, the instant second appeal has been preferred before this Court.