BANSAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI AND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satish Chaturvedi appearing for the respondents.

(2.) By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 5.7.1999 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 7 (1) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 against the order dated 18.2.1998 has been allowed and the case has been remanded to respondent No. 2 with the observations that the question of coverage has already become final.

(3.) It appears that in the proceedings under the aforesaid Act order dated 2.6.1995 was passed in exercise of powers under Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 7A. Against the said order, no appeal was filed by the petitioner. Respondent No. 2, therefore, proceeded to determine the amount due from the petitioner in exercise of power under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 7A. Order was thereafter passed on 18.2.1990. It is not necessary to state all facts relating filing writ petition in this Court and the orders passed therein. It would suffice to state that appeal was filed against the order dated 18.2.1998 only, by the petitioner. The appeal filed by the petitioner has been allowed by impugned Judgment and order. Operative portion of the said order is quoted below :