RAJA RAM Vs. CHHIDDAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Pandey, J. This is a second appeal preferred against the judg ment and decree dated November 11, 1994 passed by the learned Add. Commis sioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad arising out of a judgment and order dated 15-4-93 passed by the learned trial Court in a suit under Section 229-B of the UPZA and LR Act.

(2.) BRIEF and relevant facts of the case are that the plaintiff instituted a suit under Section 229-B of UPZA and LR Act, against the defendant Chhiddan imp leading U. P. State and Gaon Sabha concerned as defendant with the prayer that the plaintiffs be declared Asami of the disputed land as detailed at the fool of the pliant. The learned trial Court after completing the requisite trial dismissed the aforesaid suit on April 15, 1993, Aggrieved by this order an appeal was preferred. The learned Addl. Commissioner has upheld the aforesaid order passed by the learned trial Court and dismissed the appeal on November 11, 1994. Hence, this second appeal.

(3.) THE learned Addl. Commissioner has properly examined the mailer in ques tion in correct perspective of law and has drawn correct conclusion. I entirely agree with the same.