MOHD QASIM Vs. IIND ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE VARANASI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. This writ peti tion is directed against the judgment and order of the prescribed authority dated 30-8- 1986 whereby, the disputed shop was released in favour of the landlord-respon dent and the order of the appellate authority dated 28-9- 1988 releasing the disputed shop to the extent of 1/2 portion.

(2.) THE facts of the case in brief are that the landlord-respondents, Noor Jehan and Badri Prasad, purchased the disputed house from one Behari Lal by way of a registered deed dated 11-2- 1977. THEy filed an application for release of the dis puted shop. It was alleged that the landlady, Noor Jehan, required the dis puted shop for carrying business. This ap plication was contested by the petitioner. THE prescribed authority recorded a find ing that the disputed shop was required for carrying the business by the landlady. This finding was confirmed by the appellate authority. It was found further that Badri Prasad also required the disputed shop for carrying his business.

(3.) IN view of the fact that now Respondent No. 5 has purchased the property, neither Respondent No. 3 nor Respondent No. 4 nor their heirs are inter ested in the matter.