CHHANGUR RAM Vs. SHEO NATH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Yadav, Member. This refer ence has been received by the order of Additional Commissioner dated 4-8-95 in which Additional Commissioner has recommended the order of the SDO dated 30-4- 91 and 26-6-93 be set aside.

(2.) NO objection has been filed against the order of Additional Commissioner.

(3.) I have seen the order of SDO dated 30-4-91 in which he has approved the report of the Tahsildar dated 3-4-91. In the report dated 3-4-91 Supervisor Kandngo has recommended that on plot No. 713 applicant, Sheonath was in possession before 30-6-95 hence the disputed land be recorded in the name of Sheonath as non-transferable bhumidhar. This report was finally accepted by the SDO on 30-4-91. Against this order revisionist has moved a restoration application which was also dismissed on 26-6-93.