(1.) S. P. Pandey, J. This is a ref erence dated 9-9-1992 made by the learned Additional Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad with his recommen-dalion that the order dated 27-2-1991 passed by the learned trial Courl be set aside.
(2.) BRIEF and relevanl facts of the ease are that these proceedings under Section 198 (4) of the UPZA and LR Act were inilialed on an application dated 23-7-1988 moved by one, Sita Ram. The learned trial Courl after compleiing the requisite formalities rejected the aforesaid applica tion. Aggrieved by this order a revision petition was preferred. The learned Addi tional Commissioner has made this reference with the aforesaid recommendation. No written objection has been filed by the contesting opposite party.
(3.) IN view of the discussions made hereinabove, I come to the conclusion that this reference is worthy of being accepted and the revision petition deserves to be allowed.