ABHINANDAN SINGH Vs. MAHESH KUMAR MISHRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition was dismissed as not pressed on 29-10-99. The petitioner has now moved an application to recall the order dated 29-10-99 and to restore the petition and to decide it on merits.

(2.) I have heard Sri J. S. Sengar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Viresh Mishra, learned Counsel for opposite parties.

(3.) ON the basis of this rule, it has been argued by Mr. Sengar that Sri K. D. Tiwari Advocate did not obtain permission of Sri Tej Pal, who was already an Advocate on record of this case. That therefore, he could not have appeared for the petitioner nor could have moved an application that the petition is not pressed. That therefore, the order passed in the petition without opportunity of hearing to Sri Tej Pal, counsel for the petitioner, is liable to be recalled.