LAWS(MAD)-1999-7-23

BALASUNDARAN Vs. STATE

Decided On July 13, 1999
BALASUNDARAN Appellant
V/S
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Order of the Court is as follows :- Appellants are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in C. C. No. 22 of 1996 on the file of the Special Judge, N. D. P. S. Act, Chennai and they were found guilty under Section 8 (c) read with 21 of N. D. P. S. Act, convicted and sentenced to undergo R. I. for ten years each and to pay a fine of Rs. 1, 00, 000/- each in default to undergo R. I. for two years each. THE sentence already undergone is set off under Section 428 Cr. P. C. THE second accused has preferred C. A. No. 314 of 1997, the third accused has preferred C. A. No. 288 of 1997 and the first and the fourth accused have preferred C. A. No. 526 of 1997, aggrieved against the same judgment of conviction dated 31-5-1997.

(2.) THE case in brief is as follows : - THE Inspector of Police, N. I. B. C. I. D. , Chennai has laid the charge sheet against these accused stating that on 3-11-1995 at 16. 30 hours near the main entrance of Thiruvalluvar Bus Transport Corporation bus stand, parrys, Chennai, A1 was found in possession of 2 kgs. of heroin and the other accused were each found in possession of 1 kg. of heroin without any valid licence or permit and committed an offence punishable under Section 8 (c) read with 21 of N. D. P. S. Act. P. W. 5 Baskaran was working as Inspector of Police, n. I. B. C. I. D. , Chennai. On 3-11-1995, he received an information Ex. P4 from the Superintendent of Police and according to the information he went along with P. W. 3, the Sub-Inspector of Police and P. W. 4, the Head Constable and his police party went to the main gate of Thiruvalluvar bus stand and watched the accused. He intercepted the accused. In the presence of P. W. 1 and one srinivasan. He informed them about the right to be searched before the nearest judicial Magistrate or Gazetted Officer. AI knew only Telegu and as such P. W. 4 muthu narrated the information in telegu and got the answer. Ex. P5 to P8 were the notices given to all the accused. He also searched the first accused and found him in possession of heroin in a polythene cover put in a cloth bag kept into a suit case. Similarly the other accused were found in possession of 1 kg. of heroin each. He took ten samples of heroin in each one kg. bundle. THE samples and the contraband were seized under a cover of mahazar Ex. P9. He arrested all the accused and recorded their statements. THEy were brought along with the contraband to the station and a case was also registered against them. Ex. P10 is the First Information Report. He examined all the accused and recorded their statements. THEy were brought along with the contraband to the station and a case was also registered against them. Ex. P10 is the First Information report. He examined all the witnesses and sent a report to the Superior officer under Section 57 of N. D. P. S. Act.

(3.) HEARD. learned Counsel for the appellants as well as the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.