S BANUMATHI Vs. DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner prays for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay salary for the period 15.5.1991 to 12.8.1991, after deducting the subsistence allowance already paid as directed by the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka. No. 1121/A3/95 dated 27.7.1995.

(2.) NOTICE of motion was ordered on 24.7.1996. The respondents have been served.

(3.) CASE of the Respondents 1 & 2:- So far as the respondents 1 and 2 are concerned, the Government Advocate while referring the communication of the first respondent pointed out that the 3rd respondent school is liable to pay arrears of wages for the period in question and the first respondent had rightly directed the 3rd respondent to pay arrears by the proceedings dated 27.7.1995. It is also pointed out by the learned Government Advocate that the 3rd respondent school had not chosen to challenge the proceedings dated 27.7.1995 passed by the first respondent who directed disbursement of salary for the period 15.5.1991 to 11.8.1991 and it is the 3rd respondent school who has to pay the full salary for the period in question.