(1.) 1. Defendant in O.S.No.971 of 1987, on the file of Second Additional Sub Judge's Court, Tiruchirapalli, is the revision petitioner.
(2.) AN ex parte decree was passed against him and the same was sought to be set aside by filing an application under O.9, Rule 13, C.P.C. There was delay in filing that application, and the same was sought to be explained by filing I.A.No.279 of 1990. There was a delay of 260 days in preferring the application to set a side the ex parte decree.
(3.) SOME more facts are required to consider the question involved in this revision.