(1.) Revision petition filed against the orders passed by the trial court, dismissing the application, filed to implead the subsequent purchaser, who purchased the suit property, during the pendency of the suit.
(2.) The trial court taking note of the fact that since the subsequent purchase is hit by Doctrine of lispendens, subsequent purchaser could not be impleaded. Aggrieved over the same, the revision petitioners/plaintiffs have come up with this revision.
(3.) Heard both sides.