(1.) In both these cases, the common issue that arises for consideration is regarding the scope and purport of Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It will be relevant to reproduce Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, hereunder:
(2.) Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act was inserted by Act 20 of 2018 and was brought into effect from 01.09.2018 onwards. It will be relevant to extract the reply given by the Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance, while replying to the parliament, on the debate that took place at the time of introduction of the Bill through which this amendment was brought in.
(3.) Along with this amendment, Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was also brought into force which enabled the Appellate Court to insist for the deposit of 20% of the fine or compensation amount, awarded by the Trial Court against the accused person. The scope of this provision came up for consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Surinder Singh Deswal @ Col.S.S.Deswal and others Vs. Virender Gandhi in Criminal Appeal Nos.917-944 of 2019. While considering the scope of the amendment, namely the Amendment Act 20 of 2018, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as follows: