(1.) The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the first respondent dated 02.11.2018, wherein and whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner challenging the order of the second respondent in refusing to grant P5 license under Ammonium Nitrate Rules 2012 was rejected. Consequently, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the second respondent to issue the P5 license to the petitioner.
(2.) The case of the petitioner, in short, is as follows:
(3.) The respondents 1 and 2 filed counter affidavit, wherein it is stated as follows: