LAWS(MAD)-2019-12-53

MAYILSAMY Vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

Decided On December 11, 2019
MAYILSAMY Appellant
V/S
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In the Government Order first read above, orders were issued for constitution of a Special Court in the cadre of District Judge at Madurai to deal with the complaints and cases filed for unauthorized stock of granites in Patta lands and to deal with trial of offences for contravention of the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2015, and

(2.) Consequently, the Registrar General High Court, Madras in his letter fourth read above has stated that as there is some difficulty in finding accommodation for housing the Special Court at Madurai for trial of cases filed under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (as amended by Act 10 of 2015) which was sanctioned in the G.O. first read above, till such constitution of the said Court, and based on the direction of the Hon'ble Division Bench of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in its order third read above, he has requested the Government, among others, to issue necessary notification for designating the Court of Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and the Principal District Courts/District Courts in each Judicial District, in the State of Tamil Nadu as Special Courts to try the cases filed under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (as amended by Act 10 of 2015) and to cause the same published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette.

(3.) The Government after careful examination decided to accept the proposal of the Registrar General, High Court, Madras. Accordingly, the following Notification will be published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette:-