S NARPIRAVI Vs. MURUGAN ALIAS MURUGAIYAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CHALLENGING and impugning the judgment dated 5.12.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karaikkal, in S.T.R.No.1087 of 2006, this criminal revision case is focussed.

(2.) COMPENDIOUSLY and concisely, the facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this criminal revision case would run thus: (a) The police, on receipt of complaint from the revision petitioner herein, namely, Narpiravi, obtained permission from the Magistrate to register a case and investigate into it, as Section 171(E) of IPC refers to a non-cognizable offence, and laid the police report before the Magistrate under Section 171(E) read with Sec.34 of IPC as against the respondents 1 to 3 herein. Inasmuch as the accused pleaded not guilty, the trial was conducted. (b) During enquiry, on the prosecution side P.Ws.1 to 4 were examined Exs.P1 to 4 and M.Os.1 to 5 were marked. On the accuseds' side, no oral or documentary evidence was adduced. (c) Ultimately, the trial Court acquitted the accused of the offences with which they were charged.

(3.) THE point for consideration is as to whether there is any perversity or non-application of law in interpreting the evidence on record, by the lower Court.