(1.) The order passed by the first respondent in G.A.No.6 of 2012 dated 2.7.2012 is under challenge in this writ petition.
(2.) The writ petitioner-management challenging the order passed by the authority under the provisions of the Gratuity Act in G.A.No.6 of 2012 dated 2.7.2012 contended that the petitioner-company is running an electrical switchboard manufacturing industry under the name and style of 'Sri Sowdeswari Industries' at Coimbatore, nearly about 3 to 5 workmen were employed in the petitioner-company. It is a small scale industry. It is contended that the third respondent-workman during the last week of February 1999 approached the petitioner-management and expressed her willingness to undergo training in the petitioner-industry. Accordingly, she was engaged as a Trainee (Electrical) with effect from 1.3.1999.
(3.) It is stated that the writ petitioner-industry could not able to run the business and accordingly closed down the industry with effect from 31.3.2011. On account of the financial crunch, the writ petitioner-industry was unable to survive and continue the business. Under these circumstances, the third respondent-workman approached the first respondent for the settlement of the gratuity amount under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The writ petitioner-management, even after receipt of the notice from the first respondent-competent authority, had failed to appear before the adjudication proceedings. Accordingly, the competent authority/first respondent passed an order dated 2.7.2012 in Gratuity Application No.6 of 2012, the claim of the third respondent-workman was allowed.