(1.) IN both the cases, the assessees are aggrieved by the levy of penalty under the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, 1970 ('the AST Act', in short). According to them, the Department cannot do so, and rely on S.P.G. Ramasamy Nadar and Sons v. Commercial Tax Officer -III, Virudhunagar [2004] 136 STC 606 (Mad).
(2.) WHEN the matters came up for admission, the learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the above case was decided ignoring earlier decisions of our court S. Rajamani v. State of Tamil Nadu reported in [1980] 46 STC 451 (Mad), Hindustan Import Export Corporation v. State of Tamil Nadu [1988] 69 STC 195 (Mad), and above all Ashok Service Centre v. State of Orissa : [1983]2SCR363 . He submitted that S.P.G. Ramasamy Nadar and Sons v. Commercial Tax Officer -III, Virudhunagar [2004] 136 STC 606 (Mad) might require reconsideration.
(3.) WE will first deal with the pure question of law and then the two cases on their individual merits.