M CHINNUSAMY Vs. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents.

(2.) THE petitioner has stated that he is a member of the fifth respondent Society. THE members of the fifth respondent Society are land owners who are irrigating their lands by Lift Irrigation from the Cauvery Basin. Even though the petitioner is not liable to pay the electricity consumption charges, the fourth respondent has passed the impugned order without issuing any notice to the petitioner and without specifying the amount to be paid by the petitioner.

(3.) IN such circumstances, the impugned proceedings of the fourth respondent, dated 5.11.2002, is quashed in so far as it demands the payment of Rs.9375/- being the electricity charges for three years preceeding the date of the issuance of the said proceedings. However, the petition would be liable to pay the revised tariff applicable to him from the date of the impugned proceedings, dated 5.11.2002. However, It is open to the appropriate authorities to fix the electricity tariff for the preceding years, after issuing the necessary notices to the petitioner and after giving him an opportunity to put forth his case in accordance with law. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs.