S SENTHILKUMAR Vs. COMMISSIONER OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, who made submissions on getting instructions.

(3.) IT was, thereafter, the impugned order came to be passed by the first respondent on 23.7.2007. In the impugned order the first respondent, while accepting the case of the petitioner as per G.O.Ms.No.1499, Labour and Employment Department dated 3.8.1989, has however granted permission to the second respondent to pay salary to the petitioner as Junior Assistant from the date of impugned order viz., 23.7.2007, instead of granting the said benefit from the date of his original appointment viz., 16.9.1991. IT is, that portion of the impugned order, which is under challenge.