REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN " CUM " MANAGING DIRECTOR Appellant

V/S

PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR COURT CUM INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SCHOOL COMMITTEE,TILAK VIDYALAYA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,KALLAKURICHI V. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,TIRUNELVELI [REFERRED TO]
HOCHTIEF GAMMON VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL BHUBANESHWAR ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
WESTERN INDIA MATCH COMPANY LIMITED VS. WORKMEN [REFERRED TO]
WORKMEN OF ENGLISH ELECTRIC COMPANY OF INDIA LIMITED MADRAS VS. PRESIDING OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS. NELLAI COTTON MILLS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
DENANATH VS. NATIONAL FERTILISERS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
AIR INDIA STATUTORY CORPORATION VS. UNITED LABOUR UNION [REFERRED TO]
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED VS. NATIONAL UNION WATER FRONT WORKERS [REFERRED TO]
JAIPUR ZILA SAHAKARI BHOOMI VIKAS BANK LIMITED VS. RAM GOPAL SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
A UMARANI VS. REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. UMADEVI [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD VS. WORKMAN INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS. POORAN CHANDRA PANDEY [REFERRED TO]
G M ONGC SHILCHAR VS. ONGC CONTRACTUAL WORKERS UNION [REFERRED TO]
S RAMANATHAN VS. SAROJA MILLS LTD [REFERRED TO]
SPECIAL OFFICER OF THE MANAGEMENT OF T U C S VS. S LOGANATHAN [REFERRED TO]
L JUSTINE VS. REGISTRAR OF COOP SOCIETIES AND TWO ORS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) W.P. No. 37547 of 2005 is filed by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited [for short, 'HPCL'], a Public Sector Undertaking, against the Award dated 14.3.2005 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal " cum " Labour Court, Chennai [for short, 'CGIT'] in I.D. No. 311 of 2004 in granting relief of regularisation to the respondents 3 to 10 from the date of their alleged retrenchment with all attendant benefits including backwages quantified at 50%.

(2.) W.P. No. 12772 of 2006 is filed by eight workmen challenging the very same Award dated 14.3.2005 as well as the order dated 19.9.2005 made in I.A. No. 239 of 2005 and seeks for regularisation of their service from the date of completion of 480 days of service of their service, which was denied by the CGIT.

(3.) HEARD the arguments of Mr. G. Masilamani, learned Advocate General appearing for M/s King and Patridge, representing the HPCL and Mr. K.V. Ananthakrushnan, learned counsel appearing for the workmen and perused the records. For the sake of convenience, the Management is referred to as 'HPCL' and the eight individual workmen are referred to as the 'workmen'.

Click here to view full judgment.

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUME CORPORATION LTD Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR COURT CUM INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address